We recently listened to an interview
on NPR in class about a family, Julian, Ena and their children, who swapped
their comfortable lives and home for a shack in Mamelodi, living only on $300/month.
They decided to do this after visiting their cleaning lady at her home for tea
one day. She lives only about six miles away from them, in an entirely
different world. They had both heard about two people from India who had done a
similar thing, which gave them their idea. While living there they both still
went to work, all while trying to adjust to this new, temporary life and a
tight budget. They go on to discuss during the interview what they found to be
the best and worst experiences during their month in Mamelodi. The husband said
that his worst experience had to be the tweets he saw a couple of days before
they started their journey. They were told they were glamourizing poverty by
young South Africans, and that they were bringing their children into an unsafe
environment by doing this from friends.
While listening to this
interview I had similar thoughts to those of the South African people who were
upset. They only went for a month, which would not even come close to giving
them the real experiences that these people go through every day. While they
kept themselves on a strict budget of only $300 for the whole month, if they
really had needed to dip into their bank accounts they could have. They had the
option of leaving at any point if they felt it necessary.
I was also confused for their
reasoning. They say that they went there; to do this for themselves, to change
themselves. This points again in the direction of poverty tourism. They went on
to say in the interview that some people would call what they did slum tourism,
but that they did not agree, and they did not know of any alternative. In my
opinion, the alternative would have been to go there in hopes of trying to help
the community. It is great that they wanted to try to immerse themselves in the
culture, to understand how these people live differently from them, but they
should have gone with some goal in mind to help.
After listening to the interview
I found their blog they wrote during their time in Mamelodi. Most of it was
describing their day to day lives living there, from talking about
transportation to how they interacted within the community. One post I found
titled “A National Emergency” addressed the question of people asking what they
were going to do with this information after they were done. They once again
state how they went there for themselves, and that they wanted to start a
conversation not create action. The part that bothered me the most was when
they talked about what would happen if they did try to do something. They are
quoted as saying, “Sure, if an Early Childhood
Development centre was started, that would be great, but what of the low
quality schooling thereafter. What about the lack of electricity to study at
night, what about the high rates of drug addiction and alcoholism that pull
families apart. What about the exorbitant cost of transportation on the family
budget. Even if all of these were addressed, where are all the jobs to strive
for in the first place.” While these would all be tough to deal with, that is no
excuse for not trying to help.
Observation: I read an article about homelessness in New York City being at 50,000. This happened despite efforts to lower the homeless population from 38,000 about five years ago.